https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199605 Where time was not the essence of the reconveyance agreement, limitation for specific performance under Article 54 of the Limitation Act ran from the refusal to perform, not from the contractual repayment period. The proved facts showed that the claimant offered performance before expiry and the other party refused to complete the reconveyance; the cause of action therefore arose on refusal. A suit filed the next day was within limitation, and the decree for specific performance was upheld while the limitation challenge failed. en-us Fri, 29 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Mar 2018 16:00:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199605 Where time was not the essence of the reconveyance agreement, limitation for specific performance under Article 54 of the Limitation Act ran from the refusal to perform, not from the contractual repayment period. The proved facts showed that the claimant offered performance before expiry and the other party refused to complete the reconveyance; the cause of action therefore arose on refusal. A suit filed the next day was within limitation, and the decree for specific performance was upheld while the limitation challenge failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 29 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199605