https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199600 A revisional order cancelling a Hindu undivided family partition declaration under section 25A requires notice to all members directly affected, so service on only one member was insufficient and that cancellation was invalid. By contrast, notice to one partner was treated as sufficient for firm-related registration and assessment matters, and the revisional cancellation on those issues was upheld because the partition finding was rejected on the facts and on the legal approach applied. The person served was also entitled to appeal, including against the partition-related action, and was not confined to appealing only as karta. en-us Fri, 06 Mar 1959 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Mar 2018 15:11:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199600 A revisional order cancelling a Hindu undivided family partition declaration under section 25A requires notice to all members directly affected, so service on only one member was insufficient and that cancellation was invalid. By contrast, notice to one partner was treated as sufficient for firm-related registration and assessment matters, and the revisional cancellation on those issues was upheld because the partition finding was rejected on the facts and on the legal approach applied. The person served was also entitled to appeal, including against the partition-related action, and was not confined to appealing only as karta. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 06 Mar 1959 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199600