https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199599 The Supreme Court denied typists advance increments upon acquiring an LL.B. degree, overturning the High Court's decision. Steno-Typists were granted advance increments as the LL.B. degree was deemed relevant to their duties of taking dictations. The Court emphasized the importance of qualifications being pertinent to the job held and rejected the application of Article 14 for typists. The judgment directed the inclusion of Steno-Typists in the relevant Government Order and recommended a review of the relevance of LL.B. degrees for different positions. en-us Tue, 16 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Mar 2018 14:35:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199599 The Supreme Court denied typists advance increments upon acquiring an LL.B. degree, overturning the High Court's decision. Steno-Typists were granted advance increments as the LL.B. degree was deemed relevant to their duties of taking dictations. The Court emphasized the importance of qualifications being pertinent to the job held and rejected the application of Article 14 for typists. The judgment directed the inclusion of Steno-Typists in the relevant Government Order and recommended a review of the relevance of LL.B. degrees for different positions. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 16 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199599