https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199598 Article 14 of the U.P. High Courts (Amalgamation) Order, 1948 was construed as assigning cases arising in the specified Oudh areas ordinarily to the Lucknow seat, unless the Chief Justice directs otherwise under the second proviso. Presentation at Allahabad was treated as a procedural irregularity, not as invocation of a forum with concurrent territorial jurisdiction, so such matters were to be returned for filing at Lucknow. The phrase "cases arising in such areas in Oudh" was held to refer to the place where the proceeding originates, including civil, criminal, writ and constitutional proceedings, rather than the situs of the last impugned appellate or revisional order. en-us Fri, 17 Dec 1971 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Mar 2018 14:29:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199598 Article 14 of the U.P. High Courts (Amalgamation) Order, 1948 was construed as assigning cases arising in the specified Oudh areas ordinarily to the Lucknow seat, unless the Chief Justice directs otherwise under the second proviso. Presentation at Allahabad was treated as a procedural irregularity, not as invocation of a forum with concurrent territorial jurisdiction, so such matters were to be returned for filing at Lucknow. The phrase "cases arising in such areas in Oudh" was held to refer to the place where the proceeding originates, including civil, criminal, writ and constitutional proceedings, rather than the situs of the last impugned appellate or revisional order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 17 Dec 1971 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199598