https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199594 A limited fractional share in the net proceeds of temple offerings was treated as an alienable proprietary interest, not a merely personal right of service or worship, so it was liable to attachment and sale in execution under the Code of Civil Procedure. The authorities on direct worship rights and direct receipt of offerings were distinguished because the mortgage covered only the net financial share after temple expenses. In executing such a sale, the court could validly confine bidders to the class legally entitled to hold the vritti, as unrestricted bidding would be inconsistent with the nature of the property and temple custom. The execution sale was therefore upheld. en-us Fri, 23 Jul 1926 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Mar 2018 14:02:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199594 A limited fractional share in the net proceeds of temple offerings was treated as an alienable proprietary interest, not a merely personal right of service or worship, so it was liable to attachment and sale in execution under the Code of Civil Procedure. The authorities on direct worship rights and direct receipt of offerings were distinguished because the mortgage covered only the net financial share after temple expenses. In executing such a sale, the court could validly confine bidders to the class legally entitled to hold the vritti, as unrestricted bidding would be inconsistent with the nature of the property and temple custom. The execution sale was therefore upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 23 Jul 1926 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199594