<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (1) TMI 86 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199593</link>
    <description>Registration of a partnership firm under section 26A was refused because the firm&#039;s essential object was to sell opium through a licence granted only to one partner, contrary to the Opium Act and licence conditions. The governing scheme permitted sales only by the licensed person or by approved persons whose names were endorsed on the licence, and the other partners had not been so authorised. As the arrangement was designed to enable unlicensed persons to conduct opium sales through one partner&#039;s licence, the partnership was unlawful and opposed to public policy. It was therefore not entitled to income-tax registration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 13:28:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (1) TMI 86 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199593</link>
      <description>Registration of a partnership firm under section 26A was refused because the firm&#039;s essential object was to sell opium through a licence granted only to one partner, contrary to the Opium Act and licence conditions. The governing scheme permitted sales only by the licensed person or by approved persons whose names were endorsed on the licence, and the other partners had not been so authorised. As the arrangement was designed to enable unlicensed persons to conduct opium sales through one partner&#039;s licence, the partnership was unlawful and opposed to public policy. It was therefore not entitled to income-tax registration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>