https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199589 Final judgments of the Federal Court are not open to review or rehearing merely because a party is dissatisfied with the result. The Court treated finality as a controlling principle of public policy and confined any residual corrective power to narrow exceptional cases, such as slips, misprisions, manifest mistakes in drawing up the order, or similar errors where the order does not reflect what was actually decided. The applicants in substance sought a re-argument on the merits and showed no exceptional ground. The review applications were therefore not maintainable and were refused. en-us Mon, 14 Oct 1940 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Mar 2018 12:49:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199589 Final judgments of the Federal Court are not open to review or rehearing merely because a party is dissatisfied with the result. The Court treated finality as a controlling principle of public policy and confined any residual corrective power to narrow exceptional cases, such as slips, misprisions, manifest mistakes in drawing up the order, or similar errors where the order does not reflect what was actually decided. The applicants in substance sought a re-argument on the merits and showed no exceptional ground. The review applications were therefore not maintainable and were refused. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 14 Oct 1940 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199589