https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199581 Allegations of bias, malafides, and irregularities in the preliminary court of inquiry and summary of evidence were held insufficient to show reasonable apprehension of bias or material prejudice, especially because the inquiry stage was not the final ining authority and Rule 25 did not require full compliance with Rules 22 to 24 absent a proved request for presence during investigation. The convening of the general court-martial, assignment of defence, confirmation of findings and sentence, and the pending Army Act petition were also held not to disclose any illegality or prejudice affecting the conviction or sentence. Both writ petitions were dismissed. en-us Fri, 30 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Mar 2018 10:54:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199581 Allegations of bias, malafides, and irregularities in the preliminary court of inquiry and summary of evidence were held insufficient to show reasonable apprehension of bias or material prejudice, especially because the inquiry stage was not the final ining authority and Rule 25 did not require full compliance with Rules 22 to 24 absent a proved request for presence during investigation. The convening of the general court-martial, assignment of defence, confirmation of findings and sentence, and the pending Army Act petition were also held not to disclose any illegality or prejudice affecting the conviction or sentence. Both writ petitions were dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 30 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199581