https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199582 Section 13A(1) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act was confined to armed forces personnel who were already landlords of the premises during service, so a person who acquired the property only after retirement could not invoke the special eviction remedy. That interpretation preserved the provision's legislative purpose and avoided extending it beyond its object. The alternative eviction ground of bona fide requirement under Section 13(1)(g) also failed because the record supported the finding that genuine need was not established. The special statutory claim was unavailable, and the dismissal of the suit and appeal remained undisturbed. en-us Wed, 07 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Mar 2018 10:54:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199582 Section 13A(1) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act was confined to armed forces personnel who were already landlords of the premises during service, so a person who acquired the property only after retirement could not invoke the special eviction remedy. That interpretation preserved the provision's legislative purpose and avoided extending it beyond its object. The alternative eviction ground of bona fide requirement under Section 13(1)(g) also failed because the record supported the finding that genuine need was not established. The special statutory claim was unavailable, and the dismissal of the suit and appeal remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 07 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199582