https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199578 The Court treated the appellants' map as unreliable because it was neither shown to be a published map for public sale nor an official map, and it held that the burden did not shift to the respondents merely because territorial facts were disputed. It construed the constitutional amendment governing Berubari Union No. 12 as permitting a practical half-and-half division from the north-eastern corner of Debiganj Thana, not a geometrically exact line, so the division was capable of implementation. It further held that the Chilahati area remained part of the territory allotted to Pakistan, that mistaken continued administration by West Bengal did not alter that position, and that the adverse possession plea was unavailable on the record. en-us Wed, 11 Aug 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Mar 2018 10:37:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199578 The Court treated the appellants' map as unreliable because it was neither shown to be a published map for public sale nor an official map, and it held that the burden did not shift to the respondents merely because territorial facts were disputed. It construed the constitutional amendment governing Berubari Union No. 12 as permitting a practical half-and-half division from the north-eastern corner of Debiganj Thana, not a geometrically exact line, so the division was capable of implementation. It further held that the Chilahati area remained part of the territory allotted to Pakistan, that mistaken continued administration by West Bengal did not alter that position, and that the adverse possession plea was unavailable on the record. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 11 Aug 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199578