<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 230 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356527</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition, ruling that the petitioner did not meet the conditions for waiver of penalty under Sections 273(A) and 273(A)(4) of the Income Tax Act. The court upheld the Principal Commissioner&#039;s decision, finding that the petitioner did not voluntarily disclose the LTCG before detection and failed to demonstrate genuine hardship. The petition was dismissed with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 16:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 230 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356527</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition, ruling that the petitioner did not meet the conditions for waiver of penalty under Sections 273(A) and 273(A)(4) of the Income Tax Act. The court upheld the Principal Commissioner&#039;s decision, finding that the petitioner did not voluntarily disclose the LTCG before detection and failed to demonstrate genuine hardship. The petition was dismissed with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>