<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 224 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356521</link>
    <description>The court held that interest income from bank deposits is attributable to the business of banking or providing credit facilities, entitling the appellant to deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act. The court disagreed with the Assessing Officer&#039;s computation of total income and directed a reassessment. Additionally, the court found that the Tribunal failed to assess the proportionate cost of funds and administrative expenses, remanding the matter for further examination. The court set aside previous orders, remanding the case for fresh consideration by the Assessing Officer, emphasizing adherence to relevant legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 08:03:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 224 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356521</link>
      <description>The court held that interest income from bank deposits is attributable to the business of banking or providing credit facilities, entitling the appellant to deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act. The court disagreed with the Assessing Officer&#039;s computation of total income and directed a reassessment. Additionally, the court found that the Tribunal failed to assess the proportionate cost of funds and administrative expenses, remanding the matter for further examination. The court set aside previous orders, remanding the case for fresh consideration by the Assessing Officer, emphasizing adherence to relevant legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>