<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 223 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356520</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving amortized advance rent for a wind power project, deletion of expenses for completed projects, and unaccounted refundable security and maintenance deposits. The Court relied on legal precedents and evidence presented, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s claims based on lack of justification and in line with previous rulings. The judgment highlighted that once projects are completed and accounted for, subsequent entries constitute contingent liabilities, supporting the assessee&#039;s position. The Court ultimately upheld the assessee&#039;s claims and directed the deletion of the disputed amounts brought to tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 10:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 223 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356520</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving amortized advance rent for a wind power project, deletion of expenses for completed projects, and unaccounted refundable security and maintenance deposits. The Court relied on legal precedents and evidence presented, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s claims based on lack of justification and in line with previous rulings. The judgment highlighted that once projects are completed and accounted for, subsequent entries constitute contingent liabilities, supporting the assessee&#039;s position. The Court ultimately upheld the assessee&#039;s claims and directed the deletion of the disputed amounts brought to tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>