<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 69 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12138</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee on all three issues. It held that the Finance Act, 1988 amendment removing wealth-tax on stock-in-trade was retrospective. Additionally, the valuation of properties as per Schedule III applied to the assessment year 1984-85, and the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in CWT v. Sharwan Kumar Swarup and Sons was deemed applicable to the provisions of Schedule III.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 69 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12138</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee on all three issues. It held that the Finance Act, 1988 amendment removing wealth-tax on stock-in-trade was retrospective. Additionally, the valuation of properties as per Schedule III applied to the assessment year 1984-85, and the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in CWT v. Sharwan Kumar Swarup and Sons was deemed applicable to the provisions of Schedule III.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>