https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356500 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chandigarh remanded multiple appeals concerning the classification of goods for DEPB benefit back to the adjudicating authority. The Tribunal emphasized that Customs authorities' role in DEPB matters is limited to verifying exporters' declarations and that classification doubts should be referred to the DGFT. As the authorities failed to make such a reference in the case, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's orders, directing the authority to seek a report from the DGFT on classification and DEPB rates before further action. This clarified the jurisdiction of Customs authorities in DEPB matters and stressed adherence to proper classification procedures under the DEPB scheme. en-us Mon, 22 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Mar 2018 08:02:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356500 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chandigarh remanded multiple appeals concerning the classification of goods for DEPB benefit back to the adjudicating authority. The Tribunal emphasized that Customs authorities' role in DEPB matters is limited to verifying exporters' declarations and that classification doubts should be referred to the DGFT. As the authorities failed to make such a reference in the case, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's orders, directing the authority to seek a report from the DGFT on classification and DEPB rates before further action. This clarified the jurisdiction of Customs authorities in DEPB matters and stressed adherence to proper classification procedures under the DEPB scheme. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 22 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356500