<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 201 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356498</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the applications seeking amendments to the Scheme of Arrangement, stating that the proposed changes would effectively recall the order sanctioning the Scheme, altering its basic fabric and impacting the rights and liabilities vested with the Income Tax Authorities. The Court held that the loss of tax benefits post-demerger does not render the Scheme unworkable, emphasizing that no modifications were necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 08:02:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 201 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356498</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the applications seeking amendments to the Scheme of Arrangement, stating that the proposed changes would effectively recall the order sanctioning the Scheme, altering its basic fabric and impacting the rights and liabilities vested with the Income Tax Authorities. The Court held that the loss of tax benefits post-demerger does not render the Scheme unworkable, emphasizing that no modifications were necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>