<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 193 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356490</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded a case concerning the demand of service tax under supply of tangible goods and renting of immovable property for fresh consideration. The appellant contended that the transaction should be deemed a sale, exempt from service tax due to VAT discharge. Emphasizing the importance of verifying VAT payment, the Tribunal directed a fresh order based on factual verification. The appellant&#039;s reliance on relevant judgments and circulars supported their position that service tax is inapplicable to deemed sale transactions involving tangible goods. The Tribunal ultimately allowed the appeal, stressing the need for thorough verification before a final decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 10:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 193 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356490</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded a case concerning the demand of service tax under supply of tangible goods and renting of immovable property for fresh consideration. The appellant contended that the transaction should be deemed a sale, exempt from service tax due to VAT discharge. Emphasizing the importance of verifying VAT payment, the Tribunal directed a fresh order based on factual verification. The appellant&#039;s reliance on relevant judgments and circulars supported their position that service tax is inapplicable to deemed sale transactions involving tangible goods. The Tribunal ultimately allowed the appeal, stressing the need for thorough verification before a final decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356490</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>