<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 189 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356486</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants providing Optional Extended Warranty Service were liable to pay service tax as the service was classified as repair and restoration during the warranty period, making it taxable. The appellants were directed to deposit 10% of the service tax demanded. However, regarding Fleet Management Service, the Tribunal found that it did not fall under Business Support Service and the appellants were granted a waiver for the service tax demanded. The Member (Judicial) agreed with the waiver for the Optional Extended Warranty Service, classifying it under &#039;Works Contract service&#039; based on the Larsen &amp;amp; Toubro Limited case. The matter was referred to a third member for resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 08:01:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 189 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356486</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants providing Optional Extended Warranty Service were liable to pay service tax as the service was classified as repair and restoration during the warranty period, making it taxable. The appellants were directed to deposit 10% of the service tax demanded. However, regarding Fleet Management Service, the Tribunal found that it did not fall under Business Support Service and the appellants were granted a waiver for the service tax demanded. The Member (Judicial) agreed with the waiver for the Optional Extended Warranty Service, classifying it under &#039;Works Contract service&#039; based on the Larsen &amp;amp; Toubro Limited case. The matter was referred to a third member for resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>