https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356485 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal, setting aside the Commissioner(Appeals)'s decision. The Tribunal emphasized that different classifications for the same services at the provider and recipient ends were impermissible, citing legal precedents and the consistency in service classification. It noted previous decisions in favor of the appellant and ruled that the impugned order was not sustainable in law. The judgment underscored the significance of adhering to established legal principles and past rulings in resolving disputes concerning CENVAT credit and service tax classification. en-us Thu, 11 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Mar 2018 08:01:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356485 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal, setting aside the Commissioner(Appeals)'s decision. The Tribunal emphasized that different classifications for the same services at the provider and recipient ends were impermissible, citing legal precedents and the consistency in service classification. It noted previous decisions in favor of the appellant and ruled that the impugned order was not sustainable in law. The judgment underscored the significance of adhering to established legal principles and past rulings in resolving disputes concerning CENVAT credit and service tax classification. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 11 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356485