https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356484 The appeals were filed against the rejection of appeals by the Commissioner(Appeals) and the upholding of Orders-in-Original along with interest and penalty. The dispute revolved around the classification of services received from M/s. Indian Hotels Company Ltd. as either Business Auxiliary Service, Business Support Service, or management consultancy service. The appellants argued that the impugned order contradicted legal precedent and that the services availed were indeed input services eligible for CENVAT credit. The Judicial Member ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the impugned orders and allowing both appeals on 03/01/2018. en-us Wed, 03 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Mar 2018 08:01:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356484 The appeals were filed against the rejection of appeals by the Commissioner(Appeals) and the upholding of Orders-in-Original along with interest and penalty. The dispute revolved around the classification of services received from M/s. Indian Hotels Company Ltd. as either Business Auxiliary Service, Business Support Service, or management consultancy service. The appellants argued that the impugned order contradicted legal precedent and that the services availed were indeed input services eligible for CENVAT credit. The Judicial Member ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the impugned orders and allowing both appeals on 03/01/2018. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 03 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356484