<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 183 - GUJRAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356480</link>
    <description>The court set aside the attachment and distress imposed by the department on the property, noting that the attachment provisions were misapplied. The transfer of leasehold rights was deemed valid and occurred before the attachment order. The court concluded that the department could not sell what the former lessee no longer owned, rendering the attachment invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2018 13:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 183 - GUJRAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356480</link>
      <description>The court set aside the attachment and distress imposed by the department on the property, noting that the attachment provisions were misapplied. The transfer of leasehold rights was deemed valid and occurred before the attachment order. The court concluded that the department could not sell what the former lessee no longer owned, rendering the attachment invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>