https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356479 The tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeals, as the demands for Central Excise duty were not upheld due to insufficient corroborative evidence supporting the allegations of clandestine removal. The tribunal emphasized the need for substantial evidence to prove such serious charges, citing precedents from Punjab & Haryana High Court and Allahabad High Court. en-us Mon, 05 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Mar 2018 18:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356479 The tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeals, as the demands for Central Excise duty were not upheld due to insufficient corroborative evidence supporting the allegations of clandestine removal. The tribunal emphasized the need for substantial evidence to prove such serious charges, citing precedents from Punjab & Haryana High Court and Allahabad High Court. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 05 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356479