https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199566 A photocopy of a copy of an alleged reconveyance agreement could not be admitted as secondary evidence without strict proof of the statutory conditions for admissibility. The court held that the Evidence Act permits secondary evidence only within recognised exceptions and that Section 65 does not dispense with the requirements of Section 63 or the necessary foundational facts. Because the claim for specific performance depended on that document, the evidentiary basis for reconveyance failed. The alleged agreement was therefore inadmissible, the plaintiff was not entitled to reconveyance on that basis, and the dismissal of the suit remained intact. en-us Fri, 16 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Mar 2018 18:38:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199566 A photocopy of a copy of an alleged reconveyance agreement could not be admitted as secondary evidence without strict proof of the statutory conditions for admissibility. The court held that the Evidence Act permits secondary evidence only within recognised exceptions and that Section 65 does not dispense with the requirements of Section 63 or the necessary foundational facts. Because the claim for specific performance depended on that document, the evidentiary basis for reconveyance failed. The alleged agreement was therefore inadmissible, the plaintiff was not entitled to reconveyance on that basis, and the dismissal of the suit remained intact. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199566