https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199564 The Scheme treated the Automatic Approval Route and the Non-Automatic Route as separate regimes. The 50% occupiable area restriction applied only under paragraph 6(f) governing automatic approval, while paragraph 7(3) for non-automatic approval required case-by-case consideration subject to statutory requirements and any conditions imposed by the Empowered Committee. Because the approval for the industrial park did not itself impose a 50% cap on allotment to a single unit, that automatic-route restriction could not be imported into the non-automatic route. The withdrawal of approval on that footing was therefore unsustainable, and the cancellation was set aside. en-us Wed, 18 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Mar 2018 18:13:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199564 The Scheme treated the Automatic Approval Route and the Non-Automatic Route as separate regimes. The 50% occupiable area restriction applied only under paragraph 6(f) governing automatic approval, while paragraph 7(3) for non-automatic approval required case-by-case consideration subject to statutory requirements and any conditions imposed by the Empowered Committee. Because the approval for the industrial park did not itself impose a 50% cap on allotment to a single unit, that automatic-route restriction could not be imported into the non-automatic route. The withdrawal of approval on that footing was therefore unsustainable, and the cancellation was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199564