https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199559 Article explains that under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, writ jurisdiction under Article 226 may still be invoked despite an alternative appellate remedy where there is jurisdictional error, apparent legal error, or breach of natural justice. It also states that an inter-State transport agreement becomes enforceable only when the route coverage is duly published in the official gazette of the concerned State, so absence of publication defeats reliance on the alleged route entitlement. Rival permit or variation applications concerning the same or substantially the same route should ordinarily be heard together. Where an administrative order is vitiated, the normal course is remand to the transport authority rather than final grant of permit variation. en-us Wed, 11 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Mar 2018 17:29:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199559 Article explains that under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, writ jurisdiction under Article 226 may still be invoked despite an alternative appellate remedy where there is jurisdictional error, apparent legal error, or breach of natural justice. It also states that an inter-State transport agreement becomes enforceable only when the route coverage is duly published in the official gazette of the concerned State, so absence of publication defeats reliance on the alleged route entitlement. Rival permit or variation applications concerning the same or substantially the same route should ordinarily be heard together. Where an administrative order is vitiated, the normal course is remand to the transport authority rather than final grant of permit variation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 11 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199559