<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (7) TMI 371 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199554</link>
    <description>Refusal of registration of a proposed registered user under section 49(3) must be based on the statutory factors in sections 48 and 49, read with Rule 85: the circumstances of the case, the interests of the general public, and the development of industry, trade or commerce in India. The &quot;interest of general public&quot; cannot be treated as a broad policy preference detached from the Act&#039;s purpose of trade mark registration and protection against fraudulent use. A general policy against foreign-owned brand names, or a bare claim of support for the small-scale sector, is insufficient without relevant facts and data showing real prejudice to statutory interests. The authority must apply the proper criteria on the material before it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 16:00:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (7) TMI 371 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199554</link>
      <description>Refusal of registration of a proposed registered user under section 49(3) must be based on the statutory factors in sections 48 and 49, read with Rule 85: the circumstances of the case, the interests of the general public, and the development of industry, trade or commerce in India. The &quot;interest of general public&quot; cannot be treated as a broad policy preference detached from the Act&#039;s purpose of trade mark registration and protection against fraudulent use. A general policy against foreign-owned brand names, or a bare claim of support for the small-scale sector, is insufficient without relevant facts and data showing real prejudice to statutory interests. The authority must apply the proper criteria on the material before it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>