https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199551 The Sessions Court had no power to cancel a judicial bail order because cancellation under the Code was confined to the limited field where release was ordered by the trial Magistrate, while residual interference rested only with the High Court's inherent jurisdiction. Section 21 of the General Clauses Act was held to apply to non-judicial notifications, rules and bye-laws, so it did not authorise rescission of a judicial bail order. On the facts, apprehension of witness tampering justified cancellation only for one applicant, while bail was maintained for the other, subject to furnishing bond and sureties. en-us Sat, 12 May 1951 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Mar 2018 15:37:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199551 The Sessions Court had no power to cancel a judicial bail order because cancellation under the Code was confined to the limited field where release was ordered by the trial Magistrate, while residual interference rested only with the High Court's inherent jurisdiction. Section 21 of the General Clauses Act was held to apply to non-judicial notifications, rules and bye-laws, so it did not authorise rescission of a judicial bail order. On the facts, apprehension of witness tampering justified cancellation only for one applicant, while bail was maintained for the other, subject to furnishing bond and sureties. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 12 May 1951 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199551