https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199546 A Section 138 notice is valid if it clearly demands the dishonoured cheque amount; an additional claim for accrued interest does not make the demand vague. A complaint is not defeated by a technical defect in the title where the complainant is a duly authorised constituted attorney with personal knowledge and authority to prosecute. Territorial jurisdiction may lie where the cheque was delivered or where constituent acts of the offence occurred, including dishonour and non-payment after notice. On these points, the objections failed and no basis was found to drop the proceedings. en-us Tue, 31 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Mar 2018 15:07:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199546 A Section 138 notice is valid if it clearly demands the dishonoured cheque amount; an additional claim for accrued interest does not make the demand vague. A complaint is not defeated by a technical defect in the title where the complainant is a duly authorised constituted attorney with personal knowledge and authority to prosecute. Territorial jurisdiction may lie where the cheque was delivered or where constituent acts of the offence occurred, including dishonour and non-payment after notice. On these points, the objections failed and no basis was found to drop the proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 31 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199546