https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199539 The article examines constitutional challenges to the Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act, 1956, focusing on whether its anti-brothel, procuring, detention, solicitation, and related restrictions were reasonable regulations or unconstitutional restraints on Article 19 freedoms. It notes that the Court treated the anti-trafficking scheme as a permissible measure to suppress immoral traffic and as supportable under Articles 23(1) and 35(a)(ii), while expressing tentative concerns that Section 20 and part of Section 4(2)(a) were overly vague and potentially discriminatory. It also states that the writ petition was rejected as premature because no operative adverse order had been passed against the petitioner. en-us Mon, 26 May 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Mar 2018 14:11:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199539 The article examines constitutional challenges to the Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act, 1956, focusing on whether its anti-brothel, procuring, detention, solicitation, and related restrictions were reasonable regulations or unconstitutional restraints on Article 19 freedoms. It notes that the Court treated the anti-trafficking scheme as a permissible measure to suppress immoral traffic and as supportable under Articles 23(1) and 35(a)(ii), while expressing tentative concerns that Section 20 and part of Section 4(2)(a) were overly vague and potentially discriminatory. It also states that the writ petition was rejected as premature because no operative adverse order had been passed against the petitioner. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 26 May 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199539