<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (10) TMI 81 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199530</link>
    <description>A written statement admitting a balance payable in a subsisting account can amount to an acknowledgment of liability under the Limitation Act if it shows a present debtor-creditor relationship, even without a promise to pay. Here, the correspondence reflected ongoing reconciliation, repeated admissions of amounts due in the corporation&#039;s books, and a letter stating the balance payable after adjustments. The writer was also treated as having implied authority, because he had been authorised to scrutinise claims, finalise accounts, and post consequential entries. The acknowledgment therefore extended limitation, and the claim was not time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 11:42:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (10) TMI 81 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199530</link>
      <description>A written statement admitting a balance payable in a subsisting account can amount to an acknowledgment of liability under the Limitation Act if it shows a present debtor-creditor relationship, even without a promise to pay. Here, the correspondence reflected ongoing reconciliation, repeated admissions of amounts due in the corporation&#039;s books, and a letter stating the balance payable after adjustments. The writer was also treated as having implied authority, because he had been authorised to scrutinise claims, finalise accounts, and post consequential entries. The acknowledgment therefore extended limitation, and the claim was not time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>