<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 150 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356447</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the assessee&#039;s entitlement to claim deductions under Sections 80HH and 80I of the Income Tax Act for profits derived from processing cashew in factories owned by outsiders. It was determined that the profits from processing activities in sister concerns&#039; factories were directly related to the assessee&#039;s business, allowing the deduction for both assessment years. The appeals were rejected, with the option to contest the penalty imposition separately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 17:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 150 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356447</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the assessee&#039;s entitlement to claim deductions under Sections 80HH and 80I of the Income Tax Act for profits derived from processing cashew in factories owned by outsiders. It was determined that the profits from processing activities in sister concerns&#039; factories were directly related to the assessee&#039;s business, allowing the deduction for both assessment years. The appeals were rejected, with the option to contest the penalty imposition separately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>