<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 129 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356426</link>
    <description>The writ petition was withdrawn with liberty to pursue the statutory appellate remedy, and the Appellate Authority was directed to condone the delay covering the period spent before the Court and before the Policy Relaxation Committee. The operative effect was preservation of the petitioner&#039;s right to seek appellate review without prejudice from the time spent in the writ proceedings and related relaxation process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 06:33:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 129 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356426</link>
      <description>The writ petition was withdrawn with liberty to pursue the statutory appellate remedy, and the Appellate Authority was directed to condone the delay covering the period spent before the Court and before the Policy Relaxation Committee. The operative effect was preservation of the petitioner&#039;s right to seek appellate review without prejudice from the time spent in the writ proceedings and related relaxation process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>