https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12117 The court directed the petitioners to file a statement on oath by a specified date to clarify their position regarding the amount due, emphasizing compliance with procedural requirements. The Tax Recovery Officer was instructed to give a hearing, decide the matter, and provide reasons by a specified date. The prohibitory order and account attachment were to continue until a specified period post the Officer's decision, allowing the petitioners time for legal recourse. The court noted the request for lifting the attachment on furnishing a bank guarantee but required a formal application to be made to the Tax Recovery Officer. The writ petition was disposed of based on these directives, with an emphasis on procedural regularity. en-us Wed, 22 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12117 The court directed the petitioners to file a statement on oath by a specified date to clarify their position regarding the amount due, emphasizing compliance with procedural requirements. The Tax Recovery Officer was instructed to give a hearing, decide the matter, and provide reasons by a specified date. The prohibitory order and account attachment were to continue until a specified period post the Officer's decision, allowing the petitioners time for legal recourse. The court noted the request for lifting the attachment on furnishing a bank guarantee but required a formal application to be made to the Tax Recovery Officer. The writ petition was disposed of based on these directives, with an emphasis on procedural regularity. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 22 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12117