<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 126 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356423</link>
    <description>The Tribunal modified the impugned order by allowing a higher depreciation percentage and reducing the redemption fine and penalty. It emphasized compliance with its directions and considered the genuineness of documents from the exporting country, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant regarding the assessable value determination, depreciation percentage, confiscation of the vehicle, and redemption fine and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 06:33:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 126 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356423</link>
      <description>The Tribunal modified the impugned order by allowing a higher depreciation percentage and reducing the redemption fine and penalty. It emphasized compliance with its directions and considered the genuineness of documents from the exporting country, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant regarding the assessable value determination, depreciation percentage, confiscation of the vehicle, and redemption fine and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>