<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 123 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356420</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the penalties imposed on them under Section 112(1) of the Customs Act, 1962. The decision was based on the lack of evidence proving the appellants&#039; ownership or importation of the goods in question, as no bill of entry was filed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 06:33:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 123 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356420</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the penalties imposed on them under Section 112(1) of the Customs Act, 1962. The decision was based on the lack of evidence proving the appellants&#039; ownership or importation of the goods in question, as no bill of entry was filed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>