<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 111 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356408</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to exclude reimbursable expenses from the taxable value in Customs House Agent services. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner thoroughly analyzed the exclusion based on legal provisions and supporting documents. It was noted that certain charges were properly excluded, and previous decisions supported this exclusion. The Tribunal aligned with the Commissioner&#039;s reasoning and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the respondent&#039;s position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 06:32:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 111 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356408</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to exclude reimbursable expenses from the taxable value in Customs House Agent services. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner thoroughly analyzed the exclusion based on legal provisions and supporting documents. It was noted that certain charges were properly excluded, and previous decisions supported this exclusion. The Tribunal aligned with the Commissioner&#039;s reasoning and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the respondent&#039;s position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>