<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 105 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356402</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order of the Commissioner, ruling that the appellant is not liable to pay service tax on the gross amount charged for advertising services, including amounts paid to publishers/broadcasters. Additionally, the services provided to the Nigerian client were deemed as export of services and therefore exempt from service tax. As a result, the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 10:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 105 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356402</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order of the Commissioner, ruling that the appellant is not liable to pay service tax on the gross amount charged for advertising services, including amounts paid to publishers/broadcasters. Additionally, the services provided to the Nigerian client were deemed as export of services and therefore exempt from service tax. As a result, the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>