<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 104 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356401</link>
    <description>The Court directed the petitioner to file a regular appeal before the Tribunal within four weeks, emphasizing the importance of challenging orders through proper legal channels. The judgment upheld the enforceability of the demand despite the Gujarat High Court decision, deeming the argument against it fallacious.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2018 10:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 104 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356401</link>
      <description>The Court directed the petitioner to file a regular appeal before the Tribunal within four weeks, emphasizing the importance of challenging orders through proper legal channels. The judgment upheld the enforceability of the demand despite the Gujarat High Court decision, deeming the argument against it fallacious.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>