https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356393 The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order proposing confiscation of excess goods and the penalty imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 2002. The tribunal emphasized the lack of evidence supporting clandestine removal of goods and the absence of suppression of facts or mis-declaration to justify the penalty. The decision was based on legal arguments presented by both parties and references to relevant judgments. en-us Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Mar 2019 13:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356393 The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order proposing confiscation of excess goods and the penalty imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 2002. The tribunal emphasized the lack of evidence supporting clandestine removal of goods and the absence of suppression of facts or mis-declaration to justify the penalty. The decision was based on legal arguments presented by both parties and references to relevant judgments. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356393