<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 90 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356387</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, modifying the impugned order to grant the petitioner the stay requested. Additionally, the appellate authority was directed to dispose of the appeal within two months from the date of the judgment, considering the peculiar circumstances of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 06:31:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 90 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356387</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, modifying the impugned order to grant the petitioner the stay requested. Additionally, the appellate authority was directed to dispose of the appeal within two months from the date of the judgment, considering the peculiar circumstances of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>