https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356385 Further reassessment under Section 39(2) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 may proceed on additional evidence or information, and the reassessment proposed for warranty replacements and catering charges was treated as distinct from the earlier reassessment. The Court also noted that the effect of an appellate stay order on limitation under Section 40(3) raised a mixed question of law and fact. That issue was required to be examined first by the assessing authority in the reassessment proceedings, so the writ challenge was treated as premature and the assessee was directed to raise objections before the departmental authority in the first instance. en-us Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Mar 2018 06:31:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356385 Further reassessment under Section 39(2) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 may proceed on additional evidence or information, and the reassessment proposed for warranty replacements and catering charges was treated as distinct from the earlier reassessment. The Court also noted that the effect of an appellate stay order on limitation under Section 40(3) raised a mixed question of law and fact. That issue was required to be examined first by the assessing authority in the reassessment proceedings, so the writ challenge was treated as premature and the assessee was directed to raise objections before the departmental authority in the first instance. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356385