<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 87 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356384</link>
    <description>A tax case revision under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act was held not maintainable because it was filed beyond the prescribed ninety-day period and also beyond the further ninety-day condonable limit. The High Court applied the strict construction of limitation provisions in taxing statutes and held that, where the statute fixes an outer limit for delayed filing, the court cannot extend time on equitable or administrative grounds. The explanation that the file moved through the Commissioner&#039;s office did not amount to sufficient cause within the statutory scheme, and the revision was dismissed at the SR stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 06:31:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 87 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356384</link>
      <description>A tax case revision under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act was held not maintainable because it was filed beyond the prescribed ninety-day period and also beyond the further ninety-day condonable limit. The High Court applied the strict construction of limitation provisions in taxing statutes and held that, where the statute fixes an outer limit for delayed filing, the court cannot extend time on equitable or administrative grounds. The explanation that the file moved through the Commissioner&#039;s office did not amount to sufficient cause within the statutory scheme, and the revision was dismissed at the SR stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>