<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1955 (5) TMI 17 - PUNJAB-HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199509</link>
    <description>The court found Clause 3 of the partnership agreement unenforceable as it restrained the same business without specifying limits. Consequently, the plaintiff was not entitled to an injunction or relief in respect of accounts. The suit was within the limitation period, leading to the appeal being allowed with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2018 15:09:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1955 (5) TMI 17 - PUNJAB-HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199509</link>
      <description>The court found Clause 3 of the partnership agreement unenforceable as it restrained the same business without specifying limits. Consequently, the plaintiff was not entitled to an injunction or relief in respect of accounts. The suit was within the limitation period, leading to the appeal being allowed with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>