https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199505 A second appeal may raise a substantial question of law where the dispute turns on construction of a receipt and the application of legal principles to proved facts, rather than mere reappreciation of evidence. A limited tenancy permission under Section 21 cannot be attacked collaterally in execution on a plea of fraud or suppression unless there is inherent lack of jurisdiction; where the alleged defect depends on disputed jurisdictional facts, the tenant must challenge it promptly during the currency of the tenancy before the competent authority. The permission therefore remains operative for recovery of possession if not timely challenged. en-us Tue, 11 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Mar 2019 16:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199505 A second appeal may raise a substantial question of law where the dispute turns on construction of a receipt and the application of legal principles to proved facts, rather than mere reappreciation of evidence. A limited tenancy permission under Section 21 cannot be attacked collaterally in execution on a plea of fraud or suppression unless there is inherent lack of jurisdiction; where the alleged defect depends on disputed jurisdictional facts, the tenant must challenge it promptly during the currency of the tenancy before the competent authority. The permission therefore remains operative for recovery of possession if not timely challenged. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199505