https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199502 The Company Law Board allowed the joint petition under Regulation 14(4)(a) and clarified that membership is not mandatory to file a petition under Section 111(4). It affirmed jurisdiction over allotment issues but referred a complex case to civil court. In a separate matter, the Board ordered the allotment of shares to SM in recognition of her contribution, directing the company to rectify the register of members. Both petitions were resolved without costs. en-us Wed, 09 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Dec 2019 19:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199502 The Company Law Board allowed the joint petition under Regulation 14(4)(a) and clarified that membership is not mandatory to file a petition under Section 111(4). It affirmed jurisdiction over allotment issues but referred a complex case to civil court. In a separate matter, the Board ordered the allotment of shares to SM in recognition of her contribution, directing the company to rectify the register of members. Both petitions were resolved without costs. Case-Laws Benami Property Wed, 09 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199502