https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199497 An application under Section 11 before the Chief Justice does not trigger the exclusive-jurisdiction rule in Section 42 because the Chief Justice acts administratively, not as a court. A reference to arbitration under Section 8 requires a written request before the first statement on the dispute and identity between the suit matter and the arbitration clause; where the suit also concerns a separate guarantee agreement, those conditions are not met and Section 5 does not bar the action. Section 22 of SICA does not bar a composite suit primarily for recovery of leased equipment, with lease arrears only incidental, where the guarantee is not in respect of a loan or advance to the industrial company. en-us Tue, 24 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Mar 2018 11:29:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199497 An application under Section 11 before the Chief Justice does not trigger the exclusive-jurisdiction rule in Section 42 because the Chief Justice acts administratively, not as a court. A reference to arbitration under Section 8 requires a written request before the first statement on the dispute and identity between the suit matter and the arbitration clause; where the suit also concerns a separate guarantee agreement, those conditions are not met and Section 5 does not bar the action. Section 22 of SICA does not bar a composite suit primarily for recovery of leased equipment, with lease arrears only incidental, where the guarantee is not in respect of a loan or advance to the industrial company. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 24 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199497