<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 70 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356367</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for concealment of income. The addition under Section 69A for unexplained cash deposits and interest income was also upheld. However, the penalty for the addition under Section 41(1)(a) for cessation of liability was deleted as the explanation provided by the assessee was considered bona fide. Overall, the appeal was partly allowed with penalties sustained for some additions and deleted for others.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2018 07:13:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 70 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356367</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for concealment of income. The addition under Section 69A for unexplained cash deposits and interest income was also upheld. However, the penalty for the addition under Section 41(1)(a) for cessation of liability was deleted as the explanation provided by the assessee was considered bona fide. Overall, the appeal was partly allowed with penalties sustained for some additions and deleted for others.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>