<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 65 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356362</link>
    <description>The tribunal concluded that the adjustment to the appellant&#039;s income on account of interest on receivables was unjustified. Relying on precedent cases, the tribunal held that charging interest on outstanding receivables was not warranted if the assessee earned higher margins than comparable companies. The tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and deleted the entire addition, ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 08:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511163" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 65 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356362</link>
      <description>The tribunal concluded that the adjustment to the appellant&#039;s income on account of interest on receivables was unjustified. Relying on precedent cases, the tribunal held that charging interest on outstanding receivables was not warranted if the assessee earned higher margins than comparable companies. The tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and deleted the entire addition, ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356362</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>