<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 62 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356359</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the matter for further investigation on the excise duty demand issue. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the admissibility of Cenvat credit on input services were accepted based on relevant legal precedents. The penalty on the director was deemed unsustainable due to lack of evidence and involvement. As a result, the appeals were disposed of in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2018 07:13:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 62 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356359</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the matter for further investigation on the excise duty demand issue. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the admissibility of Cenvat credit on input services were accepted based on relevant legal precedents. The penalty on the director was deemed unsustainable due to lack of evidence and involvement. As a result, the appeals were disposed of in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>