<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 58 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356355</link>
    <description>Central excise duty demands based on discrepancies between profit and loss account sales and excise-return clearances were unsustainable where the assessee produced audited accounts and a reconciliation showing that gross sales included excise duty and trading sales outside manufactured clearances; in the absence of contrary material rebutting that reconciliation, the demand was set aside. The alleged short-payment demand for 2000-01 and 2001-02 also failed because the assessee furnished invoice-wise computation and the Revenue relied on incomplete invoice sets without supplying the documents requested for verification; the assessee&#039;s calculation was not shown to be erroneous, so this demand was likewise annulled. The appeal succeeded and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 12:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511156" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 58 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356355</link>
      <description>Central excise duty demands based on discrepancies between profit and loss account sales and excise-return clearances were unsustainable where the assessee produced audited accounts and a reconciliation showing that gross sales included excise duty and trading sales outside manufactured clearances; in the absence of contrary material rebutting that reconciliation, the demand was set aside. The alleged short-payment demand for 2000-01 and 2001-02 also failed because the assessee furnished invoice-wise computation and the Revenue relied on incomplete invoice sets without supplying the documents requested for verification; the assessee&#039;s calculation was not shown to be erroneous, so this demand was likewise annulled. The appeal succeeded and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>